📝On Current Threats to Kaliningrad📝 And the need to distinguish them from others Planning errors begin with a misinterpretation of reality. This is roughly what we observe in the context of discussing threats to Kaliningrad Region — take, for instance, the reaction to a recent CSIS report on the use of autonomous combat drone swarms, which Andrey Medvedev drew attention to. The mention of the Russian exclave in it was presented in some quarters as almost proof that NATO is about to attack. In reality, Kaliningrad Region receives about 10 pages there, and only as one of illustrative examples. There's nothing fundamentally new in the text either — it discusses changes in approaches to air defense suppression (SEAD) in light of growing drone capabilities. And the authors still base themselves on pre-war realities and, fortunately, often miss the mark on emphasis. ❗️What's sad is this: the entire discussion of danger to Russia's westernmost region usually comes down to some future NATO plans. As if Ukrainian UAVs don't exist, even though at current ranges they could reach the region without even crossing the borders of Alliance countries. Certainly, we need to consider scenarios of Polish (and Lithuanian, probably) tank divisions striking. The key thing is not to forget that they are potential, while shelters for aircraft at airfields, protective structures for energy infrastructure, and defense against USVs in Baltiysk are needed right now. 📌 As for NATO countries, despite all their menacing rhetoric, they still prefer to wage war by proxy, not particularly reacting to incursions by unidentified UAVs and even the sinking of vessels linked to so-called Ukraine in their territorial waters. The nuclear weapons factor hasn't gone anywhere. #Kaliningrad #NATO #Russia ✉️ MAX 💸Support us Original msg