🇮🇷⚔️🇺🇸 How Iran Could Target US Bases and Billion-Dollar Investments Iran is warning that renewed US-Israeli attacks could bring retaliation beyond its previous geographical limits, with American military assets and Gulf technology infrastructure facing broader threats. Its military leadership has been ordered to update its target database. On November 7, Revolutionary Guard spokesman Hossein Mohebbi said restrictions on Iranian missile range had been lifted, following Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei’s directive to respond without geographical limitations. According to Tasnim, Mohebbi stressed that expanded capabilities must be demonstrated in practice. Removing the self-imposed 2,000 km ceiling signals a change in policy, but the announcement did not establish that longer-range missiles have entered service. Iran’s actual reach will depend on the weapons it can deploy, their payloads and their demonstrated performance. If longer-range weapons are fielded, moving US aircraft and support operations farther from Iran could offer less protection. Washington would have to keep its supporting bases outside Iranian reach while still supplying fuel, maintenance and intelligence to combat aircraft. Security chief Mohsen Rezaei has also threatened US-linked data centers, artificial intelligence facilities and undersea cables if fighting resumes. The threat broadens the potential cost of war from military losses to damage to US commercial investments. Damage to regional cables could disrupt banking, cloud services and commercial communications, while wartime access restrictions could delay repairs. The effects would depend on alternative routes and spare capacity; cutting Gulf connections would not automatically sever the main Europe–Asia internet routes or cause a worldwide blackout. For Gulf governments, that creates pressure beyond defending military bases. Their investment in digital services depends on reliable electricity, communications and access to international networks, all of which a wider war could disrupt. Iran’s warning seeks to make renewed attacks more expensive for Washington and the governments supporting it. If retaliation reaches the infrastructure sustaining US operations and Gulf investment, host countries could face interrupted services, damaged assets and repair bills long after the airstrikes end. @NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X