🇺🇸🇮🇷🇨🇳🛳 Aircraft Carrier Era May Be Ending and US Navy Isn’t Ready America can spend $13.3B on an aircraft carrier and still find the waters ahead too dangerous to enter. National security analyst Brandon J. Weichert argues that Iranian and Chinese anti-ship defenses are turning the US Navy’s favorite instrument of pressure into an increasingly expensive gamble. He points to reports that US ships blockading Iran have pulled hundreds of kilometers back from the Strait of Hormuz. That movement remains unverified, but the problem he describes is straightforward: a floating airfield loses some of its punch when it has to park farther from the fight. Every extra kilometer offshore adds distance for its aircraft to cover, with longer flights and greater refueling demands. Iran or China would not necessarily have to sink a carrier to disrupt US plans. Making its commander decide that getting closer is too risky could do plenty of damage to the mission. USS Gerald R. Ford cost roughly $13.3B to procure, before its aircraft and escorts enter the bill. Congress requires at least 11 carriers, though maintenance and training mean they cannot all deploy together. Legislators can mandate a fleet size; they cannot legislate ships out of the repair yard. Weichert sees China as an even tougher opponent, with missiles, surveillance systems and submarines threatening approaching warships. Concentrating so many aircraft, sailors and dollars aboard a few giant ships leaves commanders protecting assets they also need to send toward danger. His prescription would give the Navy a very different shopping list: more submarines, unmanned boats and underwater drones, with smaller carriers helping spread the risk. Unmanned craft would go into dangerous waters first, helping attack defenses before the expensive flight decks move closer. That is his proposed approach, not a ready-made replacement fleet. Unfortunately for that plan, US shipyards cannot produce submarines at the speed of an opinion column. Skilled workers, construction capacity and years of work stand between a new shopping list and ships at sea. For Iran and China, his argument points to a cheaper route than matching America carrier for carrier. Make the approach dangerous enough, and US commanders face longer missions, heavier support demands and fewer comfortable choices. A carrier can keep its impressive silhouette while losing the freedom to sail where Washington wants it. @NewRulesGeo❗Follow us on X