New Rules

@newrulesgeo ยท news ยท English ยท active

Subscribers 34.1K Subscribers, last 30 days: 34K โ†’ 34K +0 24h
Reach per post (ERR) 15.4%5.2K avg views
Posting 4.5/day last 18 hours ago
Reactions per 1K views 11.1 โค ๐Ÿ‘ ๐Ÿ‘

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿผโ€๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ“‰ Americaโ€™s Space War Plan Has Workforce Problem The US military goes into any major war assuming its satellites will keep working. They warn of missile launches, locate ships, guide weapons, relay orders and connect forces spread across an ocean. If that layer is badly damaged, replacing it becomes part of the war. A new RAND study, commissioned by the Vice Chief of Space Operations, examined whether American industry could rebuild critical space capabilities within 12โ€“24 months during a prolonged conflict between 2027 and 2032. It found serious shortages in all three groups needed for the job: engineers, hands-on technicians and highly specialized experts. Only 3% of US engineers work in industries supporting the space defense sector. Security clearances for new staff take six months or more. Some expertise in electro-optical sensors and radiation hardening can require at least 15 years to develop. None of that can be fixed with an emergency appropriation after the shooting starts. The production system creates another problem. Many military spacecraft are built in small numbers rather than on continuous assembly lines. When orders pause, experienced workers leave, specialist skills fade and suppliers move on. RAND found that contractors have also done little with automation because their normal production runs are too small to justify it. That makes a wartime surge much harder than simply ordering more hardware. Factories would have to find cleared engineers, retrain technicians and restart dormant processes while the conflict was already under way. The timing is brutal. A war in the Pacific could turn on targeting, communications and navigation during its opening days. An adversary would not need to erase every American satellite. Disrupting the specific services used for missile warning, surveillance and command could leave ships and aircraft working with delayed data when it matters most. A replacement launched 12 months later cannot recover information that was missing during the battle. China and Russia are meanwhile building space infrastructure designed to recover from losses: distributed constellations, sovereign communications networks and more frequent launch capacity. Chinaโ€™s work on reusable rockets could make replacement launches faster still. Congress cannot produce a cleared cleanroom technician or radiation-hardening expert overnight. America made orbit essential to every part of its military, but never built the workforce needed to replace heavy losses on a wartime schedule. @NewRulesGeoโ—Follow us on X

Views over time

02K4K6K10 Sep 18:3111 Nov 05:094.8K10 Sep 18:31: 0 views11 Nov 05:09: 4,820 views
Snapshots we took after posting.
WhenViews
10 Sep 2026, 18:310
11 Nov 2026, 05:094.8K

Who shared this post

Posts in other channels we index that link to this one. (Forwards with a hidden source can't be traced.)