Канал им. Хьюи Лонга 🇷🇺| Huey Long and The News

Organized labor has been much more sensitive to the danger of government power and much more aware of ideological issues. Its spokesmen have fought the government in proper, morally confident terms whenever they saw a threat to their rights. (To name a few examples of such occasions: the attempt at labor conscription in World War II, the issue of U.S. contributions to the Soviet-dominated International Labor Organization, President Kennedy's attempt to impose guidelines in the steel crisis of 1962.) Labor's concern was aroused only in defense of its rights; still, whoever defends his own rights defends the rights of all. But labor was pursuing a contradictory policy, which could not be maintained for long. In many issues—notably in its support of welfare-state legislation—labor violated the rights of others and fertilized the growth of the government's power. And, today, labor is in line to become the next major victim of advancing statism. It was business, not labor, that initiated the policy of government intervention in the economy (as long ago as the nineteenth century)—and business was the first victim. Labor adopted the same policy and will meet the same fate. He who lives by a legalized sword, will perish by a legalized sword. AYN RAND, "The Moratorium on Brains" Даже с Айн Ренд не всё так однозначно в этом плане. Она была радикальной индивидуалисткой и защитницей laissez-faire, но последовательной — она считала что профсоюзы имеют полное право на экономическую борьбу, потому что это в рамках свободного согласия индивидов, а к тому же это несколько уравновешивает тот факт что именно буржуа первые прибегли к услугам государства для защиты своих интересов. Но либертарианские идиоты Айн Ренд читали одним местом, как, впрочем и коммунисты.