Lee Merritt MD: FreedomDoc1

However, voting is not a declaration that a candidate is your Messiah. It is an act of stewardship involving imperfect choices in an imperfect world. Refusing to vote does not remove evil from politics. It merely allows other people to make the decision without you. Some say voting no longer makes any difference. Yet political organisations spend billions registering voters, conducting polls, on advertisiments, litigating election rules and transporting supporters to polling stations. They plainly do not behave as if voting is meaningless. Use your critical thinking skills here and recognise the spiritual manipulation. DARPA mind control technologies are also a fact. When the Mask Slips, Marx Appears Hardly a week passes without the Democratic Party introducing another exciting new face as the future of American politics. Then the person opens their mouth—and out tumbles something remarkably similar to The Communist Manifesto, only repackaged with better lighting, fashionable slogans, and a social-media consultant. We are told that everyone should work according to ability and receive according to need. If that language moved any closer to Karl Marx, it might be sued for plagiarism. New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani and the growing democratic-socialist movement are no longer attempting to conceal their ideological direction. They present socialism as compassionate, modern and wonderfully progressive—as though the twentieth century never happened and millions of victims under Soviet communism and Maoist China were merely unfortunate administrative errors. Communism has always promised equality. What it repeatedly delivers is equal misery for everyone except those administering it. Apparently, the philosophy only failed because the wrong people tried it every previous time. Fortunately, we are assured that this newest collection of political activists—many of whom cannot organise a protest without blocking an ambulance—will finally get it right. Congressional candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier reportedly advocated abolishing borders, police and prisons, seizing landlords’ properties, and “seizing the means of production.” That last phrase is not democratic reform with a socialist accent. It is communism in a nutshell—and a rather confiscatory nutshell at that. When politicians openly tell us they intend to dismantle borders, nationalise industries and seize private property, we should extend them the courtesy of believing them. They are not whispering these ideas inside a cellar beneath Moscow. They are posting them on the internet. What more must they do—send everyone a complimentary hammer and sickle? Some activists also use public demonstrations, religious displays and blocked streets as instruments of political intimidation. The issue is not whether someone is free to practise a religion; Americaprotects that freedom. The issue is whether any religious or political movement intends to respect the Constitution, individual liberty and equal justice—or replace them with an authoritarian system. The Lord Jesus warned against turning prayer into public theatre: “But when you pray, go away by yourself, shut the door behind you, and pray to your Father in private.” — Matthew 6:6, NLT That standard applies to everyone, including Christians. Prayer should be offered to God Almighty in Jesus/Yeshua's name, not performed to inconvenience motorists or impress television cameras. Moderate Democrats introduced a “Promise to America” affirming several principles that should scarcely be controversial: “We are capitalist, not socialist.” “We want safety, not lawlessness.” “We are proud, not ashamed of America.” Yet only a small group of congressional Democrats initially supported it. Apparently, declaring affection for one’s own country has become a daring act of political rebellion. What should Americans expect from candidates who advocate abolishing police, prisons and borders? A nation without enforceable laws, secure boundaries or consequences for criminals is not compassionate.